CivilStrCalc › Articles › US Standards › 9. Retaining Wall Design
US Standards Series · Part 9 of 9

Retaining Wall Design — ACI 318-25 & ASCE 7-22

A complete guide to cantilever retaining wall design: wall type selection, geometry pre-sizing, Rankine and Coulomb active earth pressure, overturning, sliding, and bearing stability checks, Mononobe-Okabe seismic earth pressure, ACI 318-25 stem and footing reinforcement, and drainage requirements. Both US Customary and SI units throughout.

Contents

  1. Wall Types & When to Use
  2. Geometry & Pre-Sizing
  3. Earth Pressure — Rankine & Coulomb
  4. Stability Checks
  5. Seismic Earth Pressure — Mononobe-Okabe
  6. Reinforcement Design (ACI 318-25)
  7. Drainage & Practical Considerations

1. Wall Types & When to Use

Type 1
Gravity Wall
Height: H ≤ 3 ft (1 m)
Material: mass concrete or stone
Relies on self-weight; no reinforcement
Type 2
Cantilever Wall
Height: 4–25 ft (1.2–7.5 m)
Most common RC type; T-shaped footprint
Stem acts as cantilever beam; heel/toe in footing
Type 3
Counterfort Wall
Height: > 25 ft (7.5 m)
Counterforts every 8–15 ft reduce stem bending
More economical than thick cantilever for tall walls
Type 4
MSE Wall
Height: unlimited (40+ ft practical)
Mechanically stabilized earth; geosynthetic reinforcement
Common for highway and infrastructure applications

2. Geometry & Pre-Sizing (Cantilever Wall)

The following rules of thumb provide a starting geometry. All dimensions are subject to stability verification.

DimensionPreliminary estimateNotes
Footing width B0.4 – 0.7 × HUse 0.5H for initial sizing; wider for soft soils
Footing toe length Lt0.2 – 0.3 × BShorter toe → more heel soil stabilizing moment
Footing thickness tfH/12 – H/10Min 12 in (300 mm)
Stem base thickness ts,baseH/12Min 8 in (200 mm)
Stem top thickness6–8 in (150–200 mm)Taper from base to top
Key depth dkH/8 – H/6Optional; increases passive resistance

3. Earth Pressure — Rankine & Coulomb

3.1 Rankine Active Pressure

Rankine theory assumes a smooth (frictionless) wall and a planar backfill surface. It is conservative and simpler than Coulomb.

Rankine active pressure coefficient Ka
Both Ka = (1 − sinφ) / (1 + sinφ) = tan²(45° − φ/2)
Total active force Pa (level backfill)
US Pa = ½ · Ka · γs · H² γs: pcf, H: ft → Pa: lb/ft
SI Pa = ½ · Ka · γs · H² γs: kN/m³, H: m → Pa: kN/m
Arm Acts at H/3 from base (triangular distribution)

3.2 Sloped Backfill — Modified Ka

Rankine Ka with backfill slope β
Both Ka = cosβ · [cosβ − √(cos²β − cos²φ)] / [cosβ + √(cos²β − cos²φ)]

β = angle of backfill slope from horizontal; φ = internal friction angle of soil. Valid for β ≤ φ.

3.3 Coulomb Active Pressure

Coulomb theory accounts for wall-soil friction (δ) and is less conservative than Rankine when δ > 0:

Coulomb Ka
Both Ka = sin²(α+φ) / {sin²α · sin(α−δ) · [1 + √(sin(φ+δ)sin(φ−β) / sin(α−δ)sin(α+β))]²}

α = angle of stem from horizontal (90° for vertical wall); δ = wall friction angle (typically 0.5φ – 0.67φ for concrete).

3.4 Passive Pressure and Surcharge

Passive pressure coefficient Kp
Both Kp = (1 + sinφ) / (1 − sinφ) = tan²(45° + φ/2)
Surcharge (uniform load q on backfill surface)
US Pas = Ka · q · H q: psf, H: ft → lb/ft
SI Pas = Ka · q · H q: kN/m², H: m → kN/m
Arm Acts at H/2 from base (rectangular distribution)
Soil typeφ (degrees)γs (pcf)γs (kN/m³)Ka
Loose sand28°10015.70.361
Dense sand34°11518.10.283
Granular fill (typical)30°11017.30.333
Stiff silty clay25°10516.50.406

4. Stability Checks

Three stability modes must be verified at service load level (unfactored forces):

Overturning
FSot ≥ 2.0
1.5 seismic
Sliding
FSsl ≥ 1.5
1.1 seismic
Bearing
qmax ≤ qa
e ≤ B/6

4.1 Overturning

Factor of safety against overturning (about toe)
Both FSot = ΣMR / ΣMO ≥ 2.0 (static)

ΣMR = sum of restoring moments about the toe (wall self-weight, soil on heel, surcharge on heel). ΣMO = sum of overturning moments about the toe (lateral earth pressure and surcharge).

4.2 Sliding

Factor of safety against sliding
Both FSsl = (μ · ΣV + Pp) / Pa,h ≥ 1.5 (static)

μ = base friction coefficient ≈ tanφ for granular soil (use 0.45–0.55 for concrete on granular). ΣV = total vertical force on base. Pp = passive resistance from soil in front of footing (often neglected conservatively). Pa,h = horizontal component of active pressure.

4.3 Bearing Pressure

Trapezoidal bearing pressure distribution
Both qmax,min = (ΣV / B) · (1 ± 6e/B)
Eccentricity e = B/2 − x̄R

x̄R = location of resultant measured from toe. For no tension at base: e ≤ B/6 (resultant within middle third). qmax must not exceed allowable bearing capacity qa.

If e > B/6, the heel lifts and a triangular pressure distribution applies over 3(B/2 − e): qmax = 2ΣV / [3(B/2 − e)]. Aim to keep e ≤ B/6 for robust design.

4.4 Numerical Example

Given: H = 12 ft (3.66 m), B = 7 ft (2.13 m), φ = 30°, γs = 110 pcf (17.3 kN/m³), level backfill, no surcharge, stem friction μ = 0.45, allowable bearing qa = 3,000 psf (144 kPa).

Step 1 — Earth pressure coefficient and total force
US Ka = tan²(45° − 30°/2) = 0.333
US Pa = ½ × 0.333 × 110 × 12² = 2,638 lb/ft
SI Pa = ½ × 0.333 × 17.3 × 3.66² = 38.4 kN/m
Arm Acts at H/3 = 4.0 ft (1.22 m) above base
Step 2 — Vertical loads (per foot of wall)
US Wstem = 150 pcf × (8/12) ft × 11.5 ft = 1,150 lb/ft
US Wfooting = 150 × (12/12) × 7.0 = 1,050 lb/ft
US Wsoil,heel = 110 × 11.5 × 4.5 = 5,693 lb/ft (approx.)
US ΣV ≈ 7,893 lb/ft
Step 3 — Stability checks
Overturning FSot = ΣMR / MO ≈ 27,700 / 10,553 = 2.65 ✓ (≥ 2.0)
Sliding FSsl = (0.45 × 7,893) / 2,638 = 1.71 ✓ (≥ 1.5)
Bearing qmax ≈ 2,540 psf < 3,000 psf ✓
All three stability criteria are satisfied for this geometry. Stem design would proceed for Mu = 1.6 × Pa × H/3 at the footing top face, using f'c = 3,000 psi and fy = 60,000 psi per ACI 318-25.

5. Seismic Earth Pressure — Mononobe-Okabe

During earthquakes, walls experience an additional dynamic earth pressure increment. The Mononobe-Okabe (M-O) method is the standard approach per ASCE 7-22 Chapter 11 and NCHRP 611.

Seismic horizontal and vertical coefficients
Both kh = SDS/2 (typical for retaining walls)
Both kv = ±kh/2 (use kv = 0 conservatively)
Dynamic active pressure increment ΔPae
US ΔPae = 0.5 · (1 − kv) · γs · H² · (KAE − Ka) lb/ft
SI ΔPae = 0.5 · (1 − kv) · γs · H² · (KAE − Ka) kN/m
Arm ΔPae acts at ≈ 0.6H from base
M-O seismic active earth pressure coefficient KAE
Both KAE = cos²(φ−ψ−α) / {cos(ψ)·cos²(α)·cos(δ+α+ψ)·[1+√(sin(φ+δ)sin(φ−ψ−β)/(cos(α−β)cos(δ+α+ψ)))]²}
Where ψ = arctan(kh / (1 − kv))
CheckStatic FSSeismic FS
Overturning≥ 2.0≥ 1.5
Sliding≥ 1.5≥ 1.1
Bearingqmax ≤ qaqmax ≤ 1.33qa
Simplified seismic check: For most retaining walls in SDC B/C with SDS ≤ 0.50g, add ΔPae at 0.6H and recheck stability with the reduced seismic factors. Full M-O analysis is required for SDC D/E/F.

6. Reinforcement Design — ACI 318-25

6.1 Stem Reinforcement (Vertical, Earth Face)

The stem is designed as a cantilever beam fixed at the footing top. The critical section is at the base of the stem.

Factored moment at stem base
US Mu = 1.6 · Pa · H/3 (for triangular earth pressure) kip·ft/ft
SI Mu = 1.6 · Pa · H/3 kN·m/m

Design the stem as a singly-reinforced beam with b = 12 in (1 m). Vertical bars are placed on the earth (tension) face. Minimum reinforcement per ACI §11.6:

Minimum wall reinforcement ratio
Vertical ρl ≥ 0.0015 · b · h §11.6.1
Horizontal ρt ≥ 0.0025 · b · h §11.6.1

6.2 Footing Heel and Toe Reinforcement

Footing zoneNet upward pressureCritical sectionBar face
Heelqnet,heel = qsoil − γs·H (net upward)At stem back faceTop (tension on top)
Toeqnet,toe = qmax − γc·tfAt stem front faceBottom (tension on bottom)

The heel typically governs moment design in cantilever walls with a wide footing. Both sections are designed as one-way slab strips per ACI Chapter 7.

6.3 Shear Key — Design

A shear key cast monolithically with the footing increases passive resistance and is used when the sliding factor of safety is insufficient without it.

Passive force on shear key
US Fp,key = Kp · γs · (2dk·Hb + dk²) / 2 lb/ft
SI Fp,key = Kp · γs · (2dk·Hb + dk²) / 2 kN/m

dk = key depth below footing bottom; Hb = depth of footing bottom from grade in front of wall. Place key at or slightly toward the heel side of the footing centroid.

Reinforcement Design (Cantilever Method)

The key is designed as a short cantilever extending below the footing slab, loaded by the horizontal passive pressure Fp,key:

Factored moment at key base (ACI §5.3.1, U = 0.9D + 1.0H)
Both Mu = 1.6 · Fp,key · (dk / 2)
Required vertical reinforcement in key
Both As,req = Mu / (φ · fy · (d − a/2))
Min As,min = max(3√f'c/fy, 200/fy) · bk · d US: psi; SI: 0.25√f'c/fy

bk = key width (= footing thickness tf at base, in most cases); d = key effective depth = dk − cover − bar radius.

Construction requirements: The shear key must be cast monolithically with the footing — cold joints at the key base severely reduce passive resistance. Vertical dowels from the footing into the key must develop full As,req above the construction joint. Horizontal ties at spacing ≤ 12 in (300 mm) are required per ACI §11.7.

7. Drainage & Practical Considerations

7.1 Drainage Requirements

Hydrostatic pressure can be catastrophic for retaining walls. Proper drainage eliminates it entirely:

7.2 Hydrostatic Pressure (If Undrained)

If drainage cannot be assured (saturated backfill or design requirement), add hydrostatic pressure to the earth pressure calculation:

Hydrostatic pressure (water table at backfill surface)
US Pw = ½ · γw · H² γw = 62.4 pcf
SI Pw = ½ · γw · H² γw = 9.81 kN/m³

For partially saturated backfill, use the submerged unit weight γ' = γsat − γw below the water table. Add Ka·γ'·H' plus the full hydrostatic head γw·H'.

7.3 Additional Practical Notes

The single most common cause of retaining wall failure is inadequate drainage, not structural deficiency. Always specify and inspect drainage systems.

You've completed the US Standards Series

Jump to any article or use the calculators to apply what you've learned:

Disclaimer: This article presents general principles for retaining wall design per ACI 318-25 and ASCE 7-22 for educational purposes. Actual designs require a geotechnical investigation, a licensed structural engineer, and compliance with local codes. Soil conditions vary significantly by site.
← Previous 8. Serviceability Checks