CivilStrCalc › Articles › Eurocode Design Guide › 5. Load Combinations
Eurocode Design Guide · Part 5 of 5

Load Combinations per EN 1990

Eurocode combination principles — ULS equations 6.10 and 6.10a/6.10b, ψ combination factors, seismic combination, all three SLS combinations, and a complete worked example for an office building floor beam.

Contents

  1. Combination Principles
  2. ULS — Equation 6.10
  3. ULS — Equations 6.10a & 6.10b
  4. ψ Combination Factors
  5. Seismic Combination & 100%+30% Rule
  6. SLS Combinations
  7. Worked Example
  8. Interactive Combination Builder

1. Combination Principles

EN 1990 §6.4 governs load combinations for all limit states. The fundamental principle: when multiple variable actions are present, only one is taken at its characteristic value (the leading variable action Qk,1); all others are reduced by combination factors ψ0,i.

The logic behind ψ0: it is statistically unlikely that all variable loads simultaneously reach their characteristic (98th-percentile) values. For an office floor, full live load at the same instant as peak wind is improbable — ψ0 = 0.7 for offices acknowledges that wind-accompanying imposed load is at most 70% of its peak value.

Which Action is Leading?

EN 1990 requires checking all permutations — each variable action must be treated as the leading action in turn, with the rest as accompanying actions. In practice, the combination producing the highest effect governs. Common cases:

2. ULS — Equation 6.10 (STR/GEO)

The base ULS fundamental combination (EN 1990 Eq. 6.10) applies a single partial factor set to all actions:

EN 1990 Eq. 6.10 — ULS fundamental combination
SI Σ γG,j · Gk,j  +  γQ,1 · Qk,1  +  Σ γQ,i · ψ0,i · Qk,i
Recommended partial factors (EN 1990 Table A1.2(B)):
γG,sup = 1.35 (unfavourable permanent actions)
γG,inf = 1.0 (favourable permanent actions, e.g. stabilising dead weight)
γQ = 1.50 (all variable actions)
Equivalent to ASCE 7: EN Eq. 6.10 is analogous to ASCE 7 LRFD combination 1.2D + 1.6L. Note the slight difference: EN uses 1.35G + 1.5Q vs ASCE 7's 1.2D + 1.6L. For wind as leading, EN gives 1.35G + 1.5W + 1.5·ψ0·L, vs ASCE 7's 1.2D + 1.0W + 1.0L.

3. ULS — Equations 6.10a & 6.10b (Alternative)

EN 1990 §6.4.3.2 offers an alternative to Eq. 6.10: use whichever is more unfavourable of two separate equations. This approach is commonly adopted by National Annexes (UK, Sweden, etc.) because it produces less conservative results for permanent-action-dominated cases.

EN 1990 Eqs. 6.10a and 6.10b — Alternative ULS combination
Eq. 6.10a Σ γG,j · Gk,j  +  γQ,1 · ψ0,1 · Qk,1  +  Σ γQ,i · ψ0,i · Qk,i
Eq. 6.10b Σ ξ · γG,j · Gk,j  +  γQ,1 · Qk,1  +  Σ γQ,i · ψ0,i · Qk,i
Where:
ξ = reduction factor for permanent actions (EN recommended: 0.85; UK NA: 0.925)
Eq. 6.10a governs when permanent loads dominate (G ≫ Q)
Eq. 6.10b governs when variable loads dominate (Q is large relative to G)
Design to max(6.10a, 6.10b) at every cross-section

When 6.10a/6.10b Saves Material

For a typical office slab (Gk = 5 kN/m², Qk = 3 kN/m²):

4. ψ Combination Factors

EN 1990 Table A1.1 provides ψ0 (combination), ψ1 (frequent), and ψ2 (quasi-permanent) for all variable action categories.

Action Categoryψ0ψ1ψ2
Imposed — Residential (A)0.70.50.3
Imposed — Offices (B)0.70.50.3
Imposed — Public assembly (C)0.70.70.6
Imposed — Retail (D)0.70.70.6
Imposed — Storage (E)1.00.90.8
Snow — altitude ≤ 1000m0.50.20.0
Snow — altitude > 1000m0.70.50.2
Wind0.60.20.0
Temperature (non-fire)0.60.50.0

ψ2 = 0 for wind and low-altitude snow means these loads make no contribution in the quasi-permanent SLS combination — they are absent on an "average" day. This is important: SLS deflection checks for concrete beams use Gk + ψ2·Qk (imposed only), with wind excluded.

5. Seismic Combination

The seismic design situation uses a separate combination. Permanent actions are unfactored (γ = 1.0), and variable actions are reduced to their quasi-permanent level:

EN 1990 Eq. 6.12b — Seismic design situation
SI Σ Gk,j  +  AEd  +  Σ ψ2,i · Qk,i
AEd = design seismic action = Sd(T1) based forces (from EC8 analysis)
ψ2,i · Qk,i = quasi-permanent variable actions (0.3·L for offices, 0.0 for wind/snow)
Seismic mass: m = Σ Gk + Σ ψE,i·Qk,i where ψE,i = φ·ψ2,i
φ = 1.0 (storeys with correlated occupancy); 0.5 (independently occupied); 0.8 otherwise
No load factor on G in seismic: Unlike the fundamental ULS combination, seismic does not amplify permanent actions with γG = 1.35. This reflects that earthquake forces scale with actual mass, not design mass. The seismic action AEd already incorporates appropriate safety through the importance factor γI and the behaviour factor q.

Directional Combination — the 100% + 30% Rule

Real earthquakes shake a structure in all directions simultaneously. EN 1998-1 §4.3.3.5.1 specifies how to combine the horizontal seismic components. Because the worst-direction angle of attack is unknown at design stage, the code uses the following permutations (where "+" means combined with, not arithmetic addition):

EN 1998-1 §4.3.3.5.1 — Horizontal seismic combination
Combo 1EEdx "+" 0.30 · EEdy
Combo 20.30 · EEdx "+" EEdy
EEdx = seismic effects when ground motion is applied in X direction
EEdy = seismic effects when ground motion is applied in Y direction

Both combinations must be checked, and the envelope governs. This means every member must be designed for the worst of (full X + 30% Y) and (30% X + full Y).

Vertical Seismic Component

EN 1998-1 §4.3.3.5.2 requires the vertical seismic component EEdz to be combined when any of the following apply: the design vertical ground acceleration avg > 0.25g, horizontal cantilevers or horizontal prestressed members span > 20 m, base-isolated structures, or near-fault sites. In those cases:

EN 1998-1 §4.3.3.5.2 — Three-component combination
Combo 1EEdx "+" 0.30·EEdy "+" 0.30·EEdz
Combo 20.30·EEdx "+" EEdy "+" 0.30·EEdz
Combo 30.30·EEdx "+" 0.30·EEdy "+" EEdz
Same rule in TSC 2018: Turkish seismic code §4.4.2.2 adopts the identical 100%+30% directional combination — it was taken directly from EN 1998-1. The single Ed term in the EN 1990 accidental combination (1.0G + Ed + Σψ2Q) represents the design seismic action after this directional combination has been applied.

6. SLS Combinations

EN 1990 defines three SLS combinations, used for different serviceability checks:

EN 1990 §6.5.3 — Three SLS combinations
Characteristic Σ Gk,j + Qk,1 + Σ ψ0,i·Qk,i
Frequent Σ Gk,j + ψ1,1·Qk,1 + Σ ψ2,i·Qk,i
Quasi-perm. Σ Gk,j + Σ ψ2,i·Qk,i
CombinationGoverns forEC2 Application
CharacteristicIrreversible limit states (first crack, first yield)Crack width (prestress zones); stress limitation w/ prestress
FrequentReversible limit states, short-term loadsCrack width in decompression check; stress limitation in RC
Quasi-permanentLong-term effects (creep, shrinkage)Deflection calculation; long-term crack widths in RC

Deflection Limit Under Quasi-permanent

7. Worked Example — Office Floor Beam

Given
  • Simply supported RC beam, span L = 7.2 m, tributary width 3.0 m
  • Slab self-weight: gslab = 3.5 kN/m²; beam self-weight: gbeam = 7.0 kN/m
  • Superimposed dead: gSDL = 1.5 kN/m² (screed + ceiling)
  • Imposed load (office cat. B): qk = 3.0 kN/m²
  • No wind or snow on this internal floor beam
  • Using EN Eq. 6.10 (recommended approach)

Step 1 — Characteristic loads (per metre of beam)

Slab self-weight: 3.5 × 3.010.50 kN/m
Superimposed dead: 1.5 × 3.04.50 kN/m
Beam self-weight7.00 kN/m
Total Gk22.00 kN/m
Imposed Qk: 3.0 × 3.09.00 kN/m

Step 2 — ULS design load (Eq. 6.10)

wd = 1.35 × Gk + 1.5 × Qk1.35×22.00 + 1.5×9.00 = 43.2 kN/m ✓

Step 3 — Check with Eqs. 6.10a / 6.10b (ξ = 0.85)

Eq. 6.10a: 1.35×22.0 + 1.5×0.7×9.029.70 + 9.45 = 39.15 kN/m
Eq. 6.10b: 0.85×1.35×22.0 + 1.5×9.025.25 + 13.50 = 38.74 kN/m
Governing (6.10a)39.15 kN/m (−9.4% vs Eq. 6.10)

Step 4 — ULS design bending moment (Eq. 6.10)

MEd = wd × L² / 8 = 43.2 × 7.2² / 8279.9 kN·m

Step 5 — SLS quasi-permanent load (deflection)

wSLS,qp = Gk + ψ2·Qk = 22.0 + 0.3×9.024.70 kN/m
Allowable total deflection: L/250 = 7200/250≤ 28.8 mm

Step 6 — SLS crack width (frequent combination, EC2)

wSLS,freq = Gk + ψ1·Qk = 22.0 + 0.5×9.026.50 kN/m
Crack width limit (XC1, indoor): wk ≤0.4 mm

Comparison with ASCE 7 / ACI 318

ItemEurocode (EN 1990)ASCE 7 + ACI 318
Gravity ULS1.35G + 1.5Q = 43.2 kN/m1.2D + 1.6L = 1.2×22 + 1.6×9 = 40.8 kN/m
Wind ULS (leading)1.35G + 1.5W + 1.05Q1.2D + 1.0W + 1.0L
SLS (deflection)G + ψ2·Q = G + 0.3QD + 0.5L (sustained portion)
Resistance factorφ = 1.0 (use γC, γS)φ = 0.65–0.90 (no γM)
Governing combination43.2 kN/m (Eq. 6.10)40.8 kN/m (6% less)

The minor difference in total design load reflects similar reliability targets — the Eurocode and ASCE 7 formats are calibrated to achieve approximately the same probability of failure. Neither system is systematically more conservative than the other across all cases.

8. Interactive Combination Builder

Select your building's occupancy category and tick the load types present. All required EN 1990 ULS and SLS combinations are listed below.

Occupancy category (EN 1991-1-1 Table A1.1)
Applicable loads
Ed = design seismic action per EN 1998-1.
X and Y components combined via 100%+30% rule
(EN 1998-1 §4.3.3.5.1) — same as TSC §4.4.2.2.

ψ values per EN 1991-1-1 Table A1.1 (recommended; National Annexes may differ). Snow ≤1000 m a.s.l. assumed. Ed = design seismic action per EN 1998-1 — determined by site-specific hazard analysis; X and Y components combined via 100%+30% rule (EN 1998-1 §4.3.3.5.1). * = likely governing combination.

← Previous 4. Seismic Design (EC8)
Educational use only. This worked example uses EN recommended partial factors. National Annexes may specify Eq. 6.10a/6.10b and different ψ values. Always apply the governing combination from the applicable National Annex and verify all results against the current EN 1990 text. CivilStrCalc accepts no liability for design decisions based on this content.