Eurocode 2 / EN 1998 Structural Design Guide

Quick-reference for concrete design per EN 1992-1-1, ductility classification per EN 1998-1, load combinations per EN 1990, and actions per EN 1991.

1.1 Concrete (fck) — EN 1992-1-1 §3.1

Design compressive strength: fcd = αcc·fckc  (αcc = 0.85, γc = 1.5 persistent/transient)

Mean compressive strength: fcm = fck + 8 MPa

Mean tensile strength: fctm = 0.30·fck2/3 (fck ≤ 50 MPa)

Classfck (MPa)fcd (MPa)fcm (MPa)fctm (MPa)Ecm (GPa)
C16/20169.1241.9029
C20/252011.3282.2130
C25/302514.2332.5631
C30/373017.0382.9033
C35/453519.8433.2134
C40/504022.7483.5135
C45/554525.5533.8036
C50/605028.3584.0737

fcd using αcc = 0.85 (NDP — verify with applicable National Annex). Ecm = 22000·(fcm/10)0.3 [MPa] per Table 3.1.

See Concrete Classes Reference for full EN 1992-1-1 Table 3.1 values.

1.2 Reinforcing Steel — EN 1992-1-1 §3.2

Design yield strength: fyd = fyks  (γs = 1.15 persistent/transient)

Modulus of elasticity: Es = 200,000 MPa — §3.2.7(4)

Gradefyk (MPa)fyd (MPa)Ductility Classεuk
B500A500435A (low)≥ 2.5%
B500B500435B (normal)≥ 5.0%
B500C500435C (high)≥ 7.5%

EN 1998-1 requires Class B minimum for DCM and Class C for DCH — Class A is not permitted for primary seismic elements.

Rebar Properties & Bar Size Reference

1.3 Partial Factors (EN 1990 / EN 1992-1-1)

MaterialPersistent/Transient (γ)Accidental (γ)
Concrete (γc)1.501.20
Reinforcing steel (γs)1.151.00

Seismic combinations use γc = 1.5, γs = 1.15 unless National Annex specifies otherwise.

1.4 Coefficient αcc

EN 1992-1-1 §3.1.6: accounts for long-term effects and unfavourable load application on compressive strength. Recommended value: 0.85 (NDP). Some National Annexes (e.g., UK, Germany) adopt αcc = 1.0 — always verify the applicable NA before computing fcd.

2.1 Ductility Classes (EN 1998-1 §5.1.2)

ClassNameq range (typical)Detailing chapter
DCLDuctility Class Lowq ≤ 1.5EN 1992-1-1 only (no seismic detailing)
DCMDuctility Class Medium1.5 < q ≤ ~4EN 1998-1 §5.4
DCHDuctility Class Highq up to ~5–6EN 1998-1 §5.5

DCL may be used in low-seismicity regions (ag·S ≤ 0.1g per §3.2.1(4)). Choice of DC is a design decision subject to National Annex and project requirements.

2.2 Behaviour Factor (q) — EN 1998-1 Table 5.1

q reduces elastic spectral forces to design forces accounting for ductility and overstrength. Actual q depends on structural regularity and αu1 overstrength ratio.

Structural SystemDCM qDCH q
Frame system (multi-storey, multi-bay)3.0·(αu1) ≈ 3.94.5·(αu1) ≈ 5.85
Frame system (one-storey)3.0·1.1 = 3.34.5·1.1 = 4.95
Wall system (slender, α0 ≥ 2)3.0·kw = 3.04.0·(αu1)·kw
Wall system (squat, α0 ≤ 0.5)3.0·0.5 = 1.5varies
Dual / wall-equivalent dual3.0·(αu1)4.5·(αu1)

αu1: overstrength ratio — default 1.0 for regular structures; up to 1.3 for regular multi-bay frames. kw = (1+α0)/3 ≥ 0.5 (wall aspect ratio factor).

For irregular structures, q is reduced by 20% (§4.3.3.1(8)).

2.3 Ground Types (EN 1998-1 Table 3.1)

Ground TypeDescriptionvs,30 (m/s)
ARock or rock-like geological formation> 800
BDense sand, gravel, or stiff clay360–800
CDeep deposits of medium-dense sand, gravel, or medium-stiff clay180–360
DLoose-to-medium cohesionless soil or predominantly soft-to-firm cohesive soil< 180
ESurface alluvium layer over type C or D material
S1, S2Special soils requiring site-specific study

Soil factor S (amplification) ranges from 1.0 (Type A) to 1.4–1.8 (Types C/D) depending on seismicity zone — EN 1998-1 Table 3.2/3.3.

2.4 Practical Implication

The chosen ductility class (DCL/DCM/DCH) determines the behaviour factor q, the required rebar ductility class (A/B/C), and the applicable detailing provisions in Section 8. High q values reduce design forces but demand more stringent detailing.

3.1 Span-to-Effective-Depth Ratios (EN 1992-1-1 §7.4, Table 7.4N)

Minimum l/d to avoid explicit deflection calculation (fck = 30 MPa, ρ ≈ 0.5%, normalweight concrete):

Support ConditionBeamFlat SlabRibbed Slab
Simply supported202416
End span (one end continuous)263021
Interior span (both ends continuous)303524
Cantilever8106

Multiply by factor K = 1.0 for simply supported, 1.3 for end spans, 1.5 for interior spans, 0.4 for cantilevers. Modify for flanged beams (×0.8 if beff/bw > 3) and for tensile steel ratios. See §7.4.2 for full formula.

Beam Flexural & Shear Design Calculator · Slab Design Calculator

3.2 Minimum Dimensions — Non-Seismic

ElementMinimumReference
Beam width bw≥ 100 mm (cover + bar + access), practical ≥ 200 mm§9.2
Column min dimensionPractical minimum 200 mm§9.5
Slab thickness (one-way)≥ 70 mm (§9.3.1.1)§9.3.1.1
Flat slab thickness≥ 150 mm (§9.4.1)§9.4.1

3.3 Seismic Minimum Dimensions (EN 1998-1)

ElementDCM RequirementDCH RequirementReference
Beam width bw≥ 200 mm≥ 250 mm§5.4.1.2.1 / §5.5.1.2.1
Column min dimension≥ 250 mm≥ 300 mm§5.4.3.2.1 / §5.5.3.2.1
Column aspect ratio bc/hc≥ 0.25≥ 0.25§5.4.3.2.1
Normalized axial force nd≤ 0.65≤ 0.55§5.4.3.2.1 / §5.5.3.2.1

nd = NEd/(Ac·fcd) — if exceeded, section must be enlarged or load path reconsidered.

4.1 Permanent Actions (Gk) — EN 1991-1-1 §3

Self-weight of structure and fixed equipment. Concrete unit weight: 25 kN/m³ (plain), 25 kN/m³ (reinforced — EN 1991-1-1 Table A.1). Superimposed dead loads (finishes, partitions) treated as G or Q per §3.3.

4.2 Variable Actions — Imposed Loads (Qk) — EN 1991-1-1 §6

Table 6.2 (selected values — verify with applicable National Annex):

CategoryUseqk (kN/m²)Qk (kN)
ADomestic / residential floors1.5–2.02.0–3.0
BOffice floors2.0–3.02.0–4.5
C1Assembly — tables, chairs (school, café)3.04.0
C5Assembly — large crowd / dancing5.04.5
DShopping / retail4.0–5.04.0–7.0
EStorage / warehousing≥ 7.57.0

Live load reduction per §6.3.1 permitted for large loaded areas.

4.3 Wind Actions (Overview) — EN 1991-1-4

Peak velocity pressure: qp(z) = ce(z) · qb

qb = 0.5 · ρ · vb²  (ρ ≈ 1.25 kg/m³, vb = cdir·cseason·vb,0)

Wind pressure on surfaces: we = qp(ze) · Cpe

ce(z) = exposure factor (terrain roughness + orography, §4.5); vb,0 = fundamental basic wind velocity (National Annex map); Cpe = external pressure coefficient (§7).

Full MWFRS procedure requires site exposure category, building geometry, and National Annex wind map values.

4.4 Snow Actions (Overview) — EN 1991-1-3

Snow load on roof: s = μi · Ce · Ct · sk

sk = characteristic ground snow load (National Annex site maps), μi = shape coefficient (0.8 for flat roofs), Ce = exposure coefficient (0.8–1.2), Ct = thermal coefficient (1.0 typical).

5.1 Design Spectrum — EN 1998-1 §3.2.2.5

Horizontal design spectrum (Type 1 or 2 — National Annex choice):

Period rangeSd(T)
0 ≤ T ≤ TBag·S·[2/3 + T/TB·(2.5/q − 2/3)]
TB ≤ T ≤ TCag·S·2.5/q  (plateau)
TC ≤ T ≤ TDag·S·2.5/q·(TC/T)
TD ≤ Tag·S·2.5/q·(TC·TD/T²)

ag = peak ground acceleration (National Annex seismic zone map), S = soil factor (ground type A–E), q = behaviour factor (Section 2.2). Minimum: Sd(T) ≥ β·ag (β = 0.2 recommended).

5.2 Base Shear — EN 1998-1 §4.3.3.2

Fb = Sd(T1) · m · λ

T1 ≈ Ct·H3/4  [period approximation §4.3.3.2.2]

Structure typeCt
RC moment frames0.075
Steel moment frames0.085
Other structures (shear walls, mixed)0.050

λ = 0.85 if T1 ≤ 2·TC and building has more than 2 storeys; otherwise λ = 1.0.

m = total seismic mass = Σ(Gk,j + ψE,i·Qk,i), ψE,i = φ·ψ2,i (§3.2.4).

5.3 Vertical Distribution of Seismic Force — §4.3.3.2.3

Fi = Fb · (zi·mi) / Σ(zj·mj)

Linear distribution (inverted triangle) — valid for T1 ≤ 2.0 s and T1 ≤ 2·TC. For taller/flexible buildings, modal response spectrum analysis (§4.3.3.3) is required.

6.1 ULS — Fundamental Combination (Eq. 6.10)

Σ(γG,j·Gk,j) + γQ,1·Qk,1 + Σ(γQ,i·ψ0,i·Qk,i)

Typical: 1.35·Gk + 1.5·Qk,1 + 1.5·Σ(ψ0,i·Qk,i)

Alternative Eq. 6.10a/b (some NAs): use max of (1.35·Gk + 1.5·ψ0,1·Qk,1) and (ξ·1.35·Gk + 1.5·Qk,1), ξ = 0.85.

6.2 ULS — Seismic Combination (Eq. 6.12b)

Σ(Gk,j) + AEd + Σ(ψ2,i·Qk,i)

AEd = design seismic action (derived from Sd(T1), Section 5). γ factors = 1.0 for seismic combination.

6.3 Combination Factors ψ (EN 1990 Annex A1, Table A1.1)

Action / Categoryψ0ψ1ψ2
Imposed — Category A (residential)0.70.50.3
Imposed — Category B (office)0.70.50.3
Imposed — Category C (assembly)0.70.70.6
Imposed — Category D (shopping)0.70.70.6
Imposed — Category E (storage)1.00.90.8
Wind0.60.20
Snow (altitude ≤ 1000 m)0.50.20

ψ0 = combination value, ψ1 = frequent value, ψ2 = quasi-permanent value. Values are NDP — verify National Annex.

6.4 ULS — Accidental Combination (Eq. 6.11b)

Σ(Gk,j) + Ad + ψ1,1·Qk,1 + Σ(ψ2,i·Qk,i)

Ad = design accidental action (impact, explosion — EN 1991-1-7).

6.5 SLS Combinations

CombinationExpression (Eq.)Typical Use
CharacteristicGk + Qk,1 + Σ(ψ0,i·Qk,i) — Eq. 6.14bIrreversible limit states
FrequentGk + ψ1,1·Qk,1 + Σ(ψ2,i·Qk,i) — Eq. 6.15bReversible limit states
Quasi-permanentGk + Σ(ψ2,i·Qk,i) — Eq. 6.16bLong-term effects, creep, deflection

7.1 Flexural Design — EN 1992-1-1 §6.1

Rectangular stress block (fck ≤ 50 MPa): depth factor λ = 0.8, strength factor η = 1.0.

Normalised moment: μ = MEd/(fcd·b·d²)

Mechanical reinforcement ratio: ω = 1 − √(1 − 2μ)

Required steel area: As = ω·fcd·b·d / fyd

Neutral axis limit (balanced): xu/d ≤ εcu2/(εcu2 + εyd) = 3.5/(3.5 + 2.5) ≈ 0.617 for fck ≤ 50 MPa, fyk = 500 MPa.

Minimum steel — §9.2.1.1: As,min = max(0.26·fctm/fyk·bt·d, 0.0013·bt·d)

Maximum steel — §9.2.1.1: As,max = 0.04·Ac

Beam Flexural Design Calculator

7.2 Shear Design — EN 1992-1-1 §6.2

Without shear reinforcement (VRd,c):

VRd,c = [CRd,c·k·(100·ρl·fck)1/3 + k1·σcp]·bw·d ≥ vmin·bw·d

CRd,c = 0.18/γc = 0.12, k = 1+√(200/d) ≤ 2.0, ρl ≤ 0.02

vmin = 0.035·k3/2·fck1/2

With shear reinforcement (variable strut inclination — §6.2.3):

VRd,s = (Asw/s)·z·fywd·cot θ

VRd,max = αcw·bw·z·ν1·fcd/(cot θ + tan θ)

1.0 ≤ cot θ ≤ 2.5 (21.8° ≤ θ ≤ 45°), ν1 = 0.6·(1 − fck/250), z ≈ 0.9d

Beam Shear Design Calculator

7.3 Column Design — EN 1992-1-1 §6.1 + §5.8

N-M interaction diagram — biaxial bending checked by combined axial force (NEd) and moments (MEdx, MEdy). See Column PMM Design Calculator.

Slenderness check: λ = L0/i ≤ λlim = 20·A·B·C/√n (§5.8.3.1) — A = 0.7, B = 1.1, C = 0.7 (simplified). n = NEd/(Ac·fcd).

If λ > λlim: second-order effects must be considered (§5.8.7 Nominal Stiffness or §5.8.8 Nominal Curvature method).

7.4 Torsion — EN 1992-1-1 §6.3

Threshold (torsion may be neglected if combined with shear below threshold):

TRd,c = 2·Ak·fctd·tef,i — §6.3.2(5)

Above threshold, closed stirrups + longitudinal bars required. TRd,max = 2·ν·αcw·Ak·tef,i·fcd·sin θ·cos θ.

Beam Torsion Design Calculator

8.1 Non-Seismic Detailing (DCL) — EN 1992-1-1

Standard cover (§4.4), anchorage and development lengths (§8.4), lap lengths (§8.7), stirrup/tie spacing (§9.2, §9.5). No special seismic detailing required.

Crack width control: see Crack Width Calculator for EN 1992-1-1 §7.3.4 procedure.

Development Length Calculator (Eurocode 2)

8.2 DCM Detailing (EN 1998-1 §5.4)

Beams — Critical Region:

Length: lcr = max(hw, lc1/6, 0.45 m) from face of support — §5.4.3.1.1

Hoop spacing: so ≤ min(hw/4, 24dbw, 225 mm, 8dbL) — §5.4.3.1.2

Minimum 2 hoop legs within the critical region; minimum dbw ≥ 6 mm.

Columns — Critical Region:

Length: lo = max(lcl/6, hc, bc, 0.45 m) — §5.4.3.2.2

Hoop spacing: so ≤ min(bo/2, 175 mm, 8dbL) — §5.4.3.2.2

bo = dimension of confined core (to centreline of hoop).

8.3 DCH Detailing (EN 1998-1 §5.5)

Beams — Critical Region:

Hoop spacing: so ≤ min(hw/4, 6dbL, 24dbw, 150 mm) — §5.5.3.1.3

Columns — Critical Region:

Length: lo = max(lcl/4, hc, bc, 0.60 m) — §5.5.3.2.2

Hoop spacing: so ≤ min(bo/3, 125 mm, 6dbL) — §5.5.3.2.2

Strong Column–Weak Beam (DCH — §5.5.3.3.4):

ΣMRc ≥ 1.3 · ΣMRb  at each joint — columns must have greater moment capacity than beams framing in.

8.4 Shear Wall Boundary Elements (EN 1998-1 §5.4.3.4 / §5.5.3.4)

Boundary elements required if normalised neutral axis depth: xu/lw > (εsy,d + 0.00175)/(εcu2 + εsy,d) [simplified].

DCH boundary element length: lc ≥ max(0.15·lw, 1.5·bw) — §5.5.3.4.5.

9.1 Interstorey Drift Limits — EN 1998-1 §4.4.3.2

Damage limitation requirement — design interstorey drift dr under frequent seismic action:

Non-structural partition typeLimit (dr·ν / h)
Brittle (rigid) partitions attached to structure0.005
Ductile partitions0.0075
No partitions / partitions isolated from structure0.010

ν = importance factor (0.4–0.5 per §4.4.3.2), h = interstorey height. dr = qd·ds where ds is displacement from spectral analysis and qd = q (displacement behaviour factor, §4.3.4).

9.2 Diaphragm Action — EN 1998-1 §4.3.1

Floor and roof diaphragms assumed rigid in plan for standard buildings (§4.3.1(4)). In-plane diaphragm forces are transferred to lateral load-resisting elements via in-plane shear — design per EN 1992-1-1 §6.2.4 (shear between concrete flanges) and EN 1998-1 §5.9 (RC diaphragms).

Flexible diaphragm assumption may be required for large spans, unusual plan geometry, or significant openings — explicit modelling needed.

9.3 Capacity Design Principles — EN 1998-1 §4.4.2

Capacity design ensures ductile failure mechanisms (beam plastic hinges) govern over brittle failure (shear, column failure). Key rules:

  • Beams: shear design using capacity-derived forces (§5.4.2.2 / §5.5.2.1) — VEd from gravity + plastic hinge moments, not elastic analysis
  • Columns: design for moments amplified to exceed beam capacity (§5.4.2.3 / §5.5.2.2) — columns remain elastic while beams yield
  • Shear walls: shear design using amplified shear from capacity approach (§5.4.2.4 / §5.5.2.4)
ℹ️ We noticed you're using an ad blocker. This site is free and ad-supported — please consider disabling it to support us.