CivilStrCalc › Articles › TSC Standards › 8. Foundation Design
TSC Standards Series · Part 8 of 9

Foundation Design — TS 500 and ZTA 2020

Foundation design for buildings in Turkey: site investigation requirements and allowable bearing capacity per ZTA 2020, spread footing design per TS 500 including punching shear and bending reinforcement, pile foundation capacity, TSC 2018 §16 seismic foundation requirements, and a step-by-step worked example for a 5 × 5 m spread footing.

Contents

  1. ZTA 2020 — Regulatory Framework
  2. Soil Investigation Requirements
  3. Allowable Bearing Capacity
  4. Spread Footing — Structural Design (TS 500)
  5. Raft and Strip Foundations
  6. Pile Foundations
  7. TSC 2018 §16 — Seismic Foundation Design
  8. Worked Example — 5 × 5 m Spread Footing

1. ZTA 2020 — Regulatory Framework

The ZTA 2020 (Geotechnical and Foundation Design Regulation) is issued by Turkey's Ministry of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change. It became mandatory for all building permit applications after July 2020 and establishes requirements for:

Legal requirement: ZTA 2020 requires a formal Geotechnical Investigation Report signed by a licensed geotechnical engineer for all new building projects regardless of size. The report must include borehole logs, laboratory results, and geotechnical design parameters. Without this report, a building permit cannot be issued.

2. Soil Investigation Requirements (ZTA 2020)

Building CategoryMin. BoreholesMin. DepthRequired Tests
1–3 storey residential (BKS 3)1 per 500 m² plan (min 2)Bedrock or 10 mSPT, grain size, Atterberg limits, natural moisture
4–9 storey residential/office (BKS 2)1 per 400 m² (min 3)1.5 × foundation depth or 15 mSPT/CPT, c-φ triaxial, density, consolidation
10+ storey or BKS 11 per 300 m² (min 4)2× foundation depth or 20 mFull suite: SPT/CPT/PMT, triaxial, consolidation, Vs measurement
Any building on soft soil (ZE/ZF)Minimum 4Until stiff layer + 5 mLiquefaction assessment, cyclic triaxial if required

SPT (Standard Penetration Test) is the most commonly used in-situ test in Turkey. The blow count N (SPT-N value) at 300 mm penetration is the primary parameter for cohesionless soils. CPT (Cone Penetration Test) is increasingly used for soft cohesive soils. Pressuremeter tests (PMT) are required for bored pile design on difficult soils.

3. Allowable Bearing Capacity (ZTA 2020)

ZTA 2020 requires that allowable bearing capacity qa be determined from one of three approaches, in order of preference:

  1. Laboratory-based bearing capacity analysis using Meyerhof or Vesic bearing capacity factors applied to measured c and φ values from triaxial tests.
  2. In-situ test correlations using SPT-N or CPT-qc with empirical conversion factors specific to soil type and depth.
  3. Presumptive values from ZTA 2020 Table (for preliminary design only — not for final permit submission).
Soil / Rock TypePresumptive qa (kN/m²)Notes
Hard, intact rock (ZA-type)3000 – 10000+Based on RQD and fracture spacing
Dense gravel (N > 50)500 – 1000Compactness confirmed by SPT
Medium dense gravel/sand (N = 30–50)300 – 500Settlement governs for large footings
Dense sand (N = 30–50)250 – 400Settlement check required
Medium dense sand (N = 10–30)150 – 250Liquefaction check per ZTA §12
Stiff clay (cu = 100–200 kPa)200 – 350Long-term settlement governs
Firm clay (cu = 50–100 kPa)100 – 200Consolidation analysis required
Soft clay (cu < 50 kPa)< 100Pile or deep foundation typically required
Meyerhof Bearing Capacity (ZTA 2020 §8)
ZTAqult = c·Nc·sc·dc·ic + q·Nq·sq·dq·iq + 0.5·γ·B·Nγ·sγ·dγ·iγ
Allowqa = qult / FGSFGS = 2.5–3.0 (static); 2.0 (seismic)

Where Nc, Nq, Nγ are bearing capacity factors; s, d, i are shape, depth, and inclination correction factors respectively. The factor of safety FGS = 3.0 for permanent gravity loading; FGS = 2.0 is permitted under seismic loading (with qult from drained, undrained, or combined analysis as appropriate).

4. Spread Footing — Structural Design (TS 500 §13)

Once the bearing capacity is confirmed and footing plan dimensions L × B are established, TS 500 governs the structural design of the footing.

Punching Shear

TS 500 §13.3 — Punching Shear Check
TS 500Vp ≤ Vpr = 0.65 · fctd · up · dN

Where Vp = factored punching shear force (total factored column load minus soil reaction within the critical perimeter); up = critical perimeter at distance d/2 from column face = 2·(a + d) + 2·(b + d) for rectangular column a × b; d = effective footing depth.

Punching shear critical perimeter: TS 500 takes the critical perimeter at d/2 from the column face (same as ACI 318 §22.6). In contrast, EN 1992-1-1 uses 2d from the column face. This difference means TS 500 is more conservative than Eurocode 2 for the same footing depth.

Flexural Design

TS 500 §13.2 — Footing Design Moment
TS 500Md = qnet,d · (L − a)² · B / 8for each direction

Where qnet,d = factored net soil pressure (factored column load / footing area); a = column dimension in the direction considered; B = footing dimension perpendicular to the bending direction. The cantilever is measured from the column face, and critical moment is at the column face. Steel is sized for this moment using the standard flexural design procedure from TS 500 §8.

Minimum Reinforcement

TS 500 §13.4 requires ρmin = 0.0018 in both directions for footings (slightly higher than beam minimum to control shrinkage/temperature cracking in the full slab). Bar spacing must not exceed 3d or 300 mm.

5. Raft and Strip Foundations

Where soil bearing capacity is insufficient for spread footings, or building load is high and uniform, raft foundations are used. The raft distributes loads to a large area and also provides significant stiffness against differential settlement.

6. Pile Foundations

ZTA 2020 §11 and TS EN 1997-1 govern pile design in Turkey. Piles are used when soft soil extends to great depth, settlement must be minimized, or lateral loads are significant.

ZTA 2020 §11 — Single Pile Compression Capacity
StaticRc,k = Rs,k + Rb,k = Σ(qs,k·As,i) + qb,k·AbkN
DesignRc,d = Rc,k / γtγt = 1.5 (bored pile, static)

Where qs,k = unit shaft friction; As,i = shaft area in layer i; qb,k = unit base resistance; Ab = pile base area. Shaft friction values are derived from in-situ tests (SPT-N or CPT-qc) using ZTA correlation tables, or from laboratory cu tests for cohesive soils (α method: qs = α · cu, where α = 0.45–0.65 depending on cu).

Negative Skin Friction

In areas with recent fill, soft compressible layers, or regions subject to post-construction settlement (common in reclaimed land areas around İstanbul, İzmir Körfezi), ZTA 2020 §11.5 requires assessment of negative skin friction (downdrag). The pile must carry the additional load Fneg = qs,neg · As,settling as axial compression.

7. TSC 2018 §16 — Seismic Foundation Design

TSC 2018 Chapter 16 imposes capacity design principles at the foundation level for DTS 1 and DTS 2 buildings:

Common omission: Foundation tie beams are frequently undersized. TSC §16.4 requires that the tie beam's axial capacity (both compression and tension) equals at least 10% of the larger column load. For a 3000 kN column: tie beam must carry ±300 kN. This requires a significant longitudinal reinforcement area, especially in tension.

8. Worked Example — 5 × 5 m Spread Footing

Example: Square Spread Footing, TS 500 + ZTA 2020
Given: Exterior column 500×500 mm. Factored loads: Nd = 2200 kN, Mx,d = 80 kN·m (both directions). Allowable bearing capacity qa = 250 kN/m² (from geotechnical report, ZD soil). Concrete C25/30, Steel B500C. Footing depth Df = 1.5 m below finished floor, d = 500 mm (assumed initial).
Step 1 — Footing size from bearing capacity:
Characteristic Nk ≈ Nd/1.3 = 2200/1.3 = 1692 kN (approximate unfactored)
Areq = Nk / qa = 1692 / 250 = 6.77 m² → use 2.6 × 2.6 m
Check with moment: e = Mx,k/Nk = (80/1.3)/1692 = 0.036 m → within L/6 = 0.43 m ✓ No uplift
Step 2 — Net factored soil pressure:
qnet,d = Nd / (B × L) = 2200 / (2.6 × 2.6) = 325 kN/m²
(Seismic increase not applied here — gravity governs)
Step 3 — Punching shear check:
Critical perimeter: up = 2(a + d) + 2(b + d) = 2(500 + 500) + 2(500 + 500) = 4000 mm
Vp = Nd − qnet,d × (a + d)(b + d) = 2200 − 325 × 1.0 × 1.0 = 1875 kN
Vpr = 0.65 × 1.20 × 4000 × 500 / 1000 = 1560 kN
Vp = 1875 kN > Vpr = 1560 kN ✗ → Increase d to 600 mm
Revised d = 600 mm:
up = 2(500+600) + 2(500+600) = 4400 mm
Vp = 2200 − 325 × 1.1 × 1.1 = 2200 − 393 = 1807 kN
Vpr = 0.65 × 1.20 × 4400 × 600 / 1000 = 2059 kN > 1807 kN ✓
Step 4 — Flexural design:
Md = 325 × (2.6 − 0.5)² / 8 × 2.6 = 325 × 4.41 / 8 × 2.6 = 466 kN·m
Solve for As: using C25/30 (fcd=16.7 MPa) and B500C (fyd=435 MPa), d=600 mm, b=2600 mm
Required As ≈ 2050 mm² per direction (from beam flexure equations)
As,min = 0.0018 × 2600 × 600 = 2808 mm² governs → use 10φ20 (As=3142 mm²) each direction ✓
Result: 2.6 × 2.6 × 0.7 m footing (h = d + cover = 600 + 70 = 670 mm, use 700 mm). 10φ20 @ 260 mm each way, bottom layer in both directions.
Preliminary design only. Foundation design requires site-specific geotechnical data from a licensed geotechnical engineer per ZTA 2020. Settlement analysis must be performed separately. Always verify with a licensed structural engineer.
← Previous Wind Loads per TS 498 / TS EN 1991 Next → Retaining Wall Design per TS 500