CivilStrCalc › Articles › IS Standards › 3. Load Combinations
IS Standards Series · Part 3 of 9

Load Combinations & Partial Safety Factors

Complete reference for ULS and SLS load combinations per IS 456:2000 Table 18, IS 875 Parts 1–3, and IS 1893:2016. Covers gravity-only, wind, and seismic combinations with partial safety factor rationale.

Contents

  1. Load Types and Standards
  2. IS 456 ULS Combinations (Table 18)
  3. IS 1893 Seismic Combinations
  4. IS 800 Steel Load Combinations
  5. Serviceability Combinations
  6. Comparison with Other Codes

1. Load Types and Standards

Load TypeSymbolReferenceNotes
Dead LoadDL (or G)IS 875 Part 1Self-weight of structure + permanent fixtures
Imposed (Live) LoadLL (or Q)IS 875 Part 2Floor: 1.5–5.0 kN/m²; roof: 0.75–1.5 kN/m²
Wind LoadWLIS 875 Part 3:2015Vb from wind map, k1k2k3k4 factors
Seismic LoadEQIS 1893 Part 1:2016Zone-based pseudo-static base shear
Snow LoadSLIS 875 Part 4High-altitude regions only
Temperature EffectsTIS 875 Part 5Restrained structures, long spans
Wind vs. seismic: IS 1893 Cl.6.3.1 states that wind and earthquake loads need not be considered simultaneously. Design for whichever produces the more critical demand (typically seismic for zones III–V, wind for coastal/tall structures).

2. IS 456 ULS Combinations — Table 18

IS 456:2000 Table 18 defines the load combinations for Ultimate Limit State (Limit State of Collapse) design of reinforced concrete structures:

#CombinationDL factorLL factorWL / EQ factor
1DL + LL1.51.5—
2DL + LL + WL1.21.21.2
3DL + WL (WL adverse)1.5—1.5
4DL − WL (DL stabilising)0.9—1.5
5DL + LL + EQ1.21.21.2
6DL + EQ (EQ adverse)1.5—1.5
7DL − EQ (DL stabilising)0.9—1.5

Key Observations

Most Common ULS Design Demands
GravityFd = 1.5·DL + 1.5·LL
Wind/SeismicFd = 1.2·DL + 1.2·LL + 1.2·WL(EQ)  [or]  1.5·DL + 1.5·WL(EQ)
OverturningFd = 0.9·DL + 1.5·WL(EQ)

3. IS 1893 Seismic Combinations

IS 1893:2016 Cl.6.3 specifies additional combinations where the seismic force EQ is the primary variable load. EQ acts simultaneously in ±X, ±Y directions (horizontal); vertical seismic is 2/3 of horizontal for vertical members.

#CombinationDLLLEQXEQY
1DL + LL + EQX1.21.2±1.20
2DL + LL + EQY1.21.20±1.2
3DL + EQX1.50±1.50
4DL + EQY1.500±1.5
50.9DL + EQX (uplift)0.90±1.50
60.9DL + EQY (uplift)0.900±1.5

Live Load Reduction for Seismic

IS 1893 Cl.7.3 permits reduction of imposed loads when computing seismic mass:

4. IS 800 Steel Load Combinations

IS 800:2007 Table 4 lists combinations consistent with IS 456 but expressed for steel frame design. The partial safety factors for loads (γf) are the same as IS 456 Table 18.

Limit StateDLLLWL/EQT
Strength (ULS) — DL + LL1.51.5——
Strength — DL + LL + WL/EQ1.21.21.2—
Strength — DL + WL/EQ only1.5—1.5—
Strength — DL + LL + T1.21.2—1.2
Serviceability — all loads1.01.01.01.0

5. Serviceability Combinations

For deflection, cracking, and vibration checks (Limit State of Serviceability), IS 456 uses unfactored (characteristic) loads:

SLS Load Combination — IS 456 Cl.35
SLSFservice = 1.0·DL + 1.0·LL
SLS + WindFservice = 1.0·DL + 1.0·LL + 1.0·WL

Deflection limits (IS 456 Cl.23.2):

6. Comparison with Other Codes

CombinationIS 456 (India)ACI / ASCE 7 (US)Eurocode (EU)
Gravity only (DL+LL)1.5DL + 1.5LL1.2DL + 1.6LL1.35DL + 1.5LL
DL + LL + Wind/EQ1.2(DL+LL+W)1.2DL + 1.0LL + 1.0W1.35DL + 1.5LL + 0.9W
DL + Wind/EQ1.5DL + 1.5W0.9DL + 1.0W1.0DL + 1.5W
DL stabilising0.9DL0.9DL1.0DL
SeismicIS 1893 Cl.6.3ASCE 7 §12.4EN 1998-1 §4.3
IS 456 vs ACI 318: The IS 456 gravity combination (1.5DL + 1.5LL) applies the same factor to both DL and LL, which is simpler but less nuanced than ACI's differentiated 1.2/1.6 approach. For DL-dominant structures (heavy RC), IS 456 may be slightly more conservative than ACI; for LL-dominant structures (warehouses), IS 456 may be slightly less conservative.
Preliminary design only. Always verify load combinations with the current edition of IS 456, IS 875, and IS 1893 and a licensed structural engineer.
← Previous Material Properties Next → RC Design per IS 456